The long-anticipated meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any agreement to halt the war in Ukraine, despite both leaders hailing the talks as “productive.”
The nearly three-hour summit, their first since 2019, was billed as a potential turning point in Europe’s deadliest conflict since World War II. Instead, it yielded broad statements about progress on unspecified issues but no immediate steps toward a ceasefire or follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a goal Trump had set before the talks.
Key takeaways from the Alaska Summit;
No ceasefire or concrete agreement
While Trump said there were “many points” of agreement and “a couple of big ones” still unresolved, neither side outlined any binding commitments. The absence of even a framework for halting hostilities signaled that the war will continue for now.
Trump said “there’s no deal until there’s a deal,” noting progress on “many points” but admitting one “most significant” issue remained unresolved. He plans to brief NATO allies and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Putin’s broad agenda
Putin described the talks as “constructive” and suggested Ukraine was just one of several topics discussed, citing potential cooperation in trade, the Arctic, and space.
Both leaders declined to share specifics, ending what had been billed as a joint press conference without taking questions.
Putin holds firm on preconditions
The Russian president reiterated that so-called “root causes” — Moscow’s longstanding justifications for its invasion — must be addressed before lasting peace can be reached. This effectively rules out an immediate ceasefire and keeps negotiations tied to Russia’s political demands.
European anxiety
Allies had feared Trump might agree to concessions involving Ukrainian territory without Kyiv’s consent. While no such deal was announced, the lack of transparency is likely to heighten concerns.
Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky welcomed U.S. mediation but doubted Putin’s commitment to peace, saying, “If Putin were serious about negotiating, he would not have been attacking Ukraine all day today.” Such statements suggest limited European faith in the summit’s outcomes.
Longer than Helsinki
The two leaders met for more than two-and-a-half hours — longer than their 2018 Helsinki talks — after a private conversation in Trump’s limousine en route to the venue.
Kyiv on Edge
Zelenskiy, excluded from the meeting, has publicly rejected any deal involving territorial concessions and is seeking firm security guarantees backed by Washington. Opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said Putin had “bought himself more time,” reflecting Kyiv’s fear that Moscow is using talks to stall while continuing military operations.
Fighting unabated during talks
Even as Trump and Putin met, eastern Ukraine remained under air raid alerts, and Russian regional governors reported Ukrainian drone attacks in Rostov and Bryansk. This underscored the war’s intensity and the gap between diplomatic gestures and realities on the ground.
Symbolic optics
The meeting, his first with a U.S. president since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, allowed Putin to present himself as a legitimate global player despite an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes. The optics of being welcomed on U.S. soil — complete with red-carpet reception — were a diplomatic boost for the Kremlin.
Trump’s peace credentials tested
Trump, who has repeatedly claimed he could end the war “within 24 hours,” acknowledged that brokering peace was “tougher” than expected. He had hoped to follow this summit with a three-way meeting involving Zelenskiy, which now appears unlikely in the short term.
High-level representation
The U.S. delegation included Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Russia was represented by veteran foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, reflecting the strategic weight both sides placed on the meeting.
Zelenskiy’s pre-summit appeal
Before the talks, Zelenskiy urged “necessary steps” toward ending the war, stressing, “We are counting on America.” His absence from the table leaves questions about how directly Ukraine’s positions were represented.
The nearly three-hour summit, their first since 2019, was billed as a potential turning point in Europe’s deadliest conflict since World War II. Instead, it yielded broad statements about progress on unspecified issues but no immediate steps toward a ceasefire or follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a goal Trump had set before the talks.
Key takeaways from the Alaska Summit;
No ceasefire or concrete agreement
While Trump said there were “many points” of agreement and “a couple of big ones” still unresolved, neither side outlined any binding commitments. The absence of even a framework for halting hostilities signaled that the war will continue for now.
Trump said “there’s no deal until there’s a deal,” noting progress on “many points” but admitting one “most significant” issue remained unresolved. He plans to brief NATO allies and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Putin’s broad agenda
Putin described the talks as “constructive” and suggested Ukraine was just one of several topics discussed, citing potential cooperation in trade, the Arctic, and space.
Both leaders declined to share specifics, ending what had been billed as a joint press conference without taking questions.
Putin holds firm on preconditions
The Russian president reiterated that so-called “root causes” — Moscow’s longstanding justifications for its invasion — must be addressed before lasting peace can be reached. This effectively rules out an immediate ceasefire and keeps negotiations tied to Russia’s political demands.
European anxiety
Allies had feared Trump might agree to concessions involving Ukrainian territory without Kyiv’s consent. While no such deal was announced, the lack of transparency is likely to heighten concerns.
Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky welcomed U.S. mediation but doubted Putin’s commitment to peace, saying, “If Putin were serious about negotiating, he would not have been attacking Ukraine all day today.” Such statements suggest limited European faith in the summit’s outcomes.
Longer than Helsinki
The two leaders met for more than two-and-a-half hours — longer than their 2018 Helsinki talks — after a private conversation in Trump’s limousine en route to the venue.
Kyiv on Edge
Zelenskiy, excluded from the meeting, has publicly rejected any deal involving territorial concessions and is seeking firm security guarantees backed by Washington. Opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said Putin had “bought himself more time,” reflecting Kyiv’s fear that Moscow is using talks to stall while continuing military operations.
Fighting unabated during talks
Even as Trump and Putin met, eastern Ukraine remained under air raid alerts, and Russian regional governors reported Ukrainian drone attacks in Rostov and Bryansk. This underscored the war’s intensity and the gap between diplomatic gestures and realities on the ground.
Symbolic optics
The meeting, his first with a U.S. president since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, allowed Putin to present himself as a legitimate global player despite an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes. The optics of being welcomed on U.S. soil — complete with red-carpet reception — were a diplomatic boost for the Kremlin.
Trump’s peace credentials tested
Trump, who has repeatedly claimed he could end the war “within 24 hours,” acknowledged that brokering peace was “tougher” than expected. He had hoped to follow this summit with a three-way meeting involving Zelenskiy, which now appears unlikely in the short term.
High-level representation
The U.S. delegation included Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Russia was represented by veteran foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, reflecting the strategic weight both sides placed on the meeting.
Zelenskiy’s pre-summit appeal
Before the talks, Zelenskiy urged “necessary steps” toward ending the war, stressing, “We are counting on America.” His absence from the table leaves questions about how directly Ukraine’s positions were represented.
You may also like
Rare luxury watches made out of rubbish shoppers 'couldn't be happier with'
'Powerful' Amazon cordless vacuum with 33% off 'makes cleaning faster'
I tested Tower air fryer to perfectly cook salmon using Mary Berry's method
My Chemical Romance tickets and how to buy them after general onsale
I drove the Chinese car that looks exactly like a Range Rover - but costs £60,000 less
